Source of Authority

Statutory/municipal framework, especially territorial power under
Art. IV, Sec. 3, Cl. 2 (“make all needful Rules and Regulations”);
treated as plenary.

Constitution of the United States of America,
ratified 1789; limited, enumerated powers under Art. I, Sec. 8.

Name / Identity

Document says: “United States of America… self described, never voted
on by the People, apparently created by Congress in 1948… operates as
a democracy, under the United States Constitution, a mere statute…”

Document says: “The ‘true name’ is ‘The United States of America’…
created by We the People… by their Constitution… March 4, 1789.”

Form of Government

Hypothesis: operates as a democracy/corporate municipal
system; people function as subjects of administrative/statutory rules
rather than sovereigns.

“The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a
Republican form of Government.” — republican, representative,
sovereignty in the people.

Sovereignty of the People

Hypothesis: people have been converted into “subjects”:
“You are a SUBJECT, and have NO rights, but what are granted by your
master.” (De La Guerra quote as interpreted in the document.)

Document quotes Dred Scott: “They are what we familiarly call the
‘sovereign people,’ and every citizen is one of this people, and a
constituent member of this sovereignty.”

Money / Tender

Hypothesis: removal of gold/silver and exclusive use of Federal Reserve
Notes = shift into commercial jurisdiction; “Mere USE OF commercial
paper SUBJECTS all users to the U.C.C and Congress’ commercial power.”

Art. I, Sec. 10: “No State shall… make any Thing but gold and silver Coin
a Tender in Payment of Debts.” Sovereign states tied to specie.

Courts

28 U.S.C. creates “United States district courts” operating in
territories/administrative divisions; hypothesis says these displaced
the original “district courts of the United States.”

Judiciary Act of 1789: “district courts of the United States” operating
in the several States, under Article III judicial power.

States

Hypothesis: “states” redefined as federal administrative divisions
populated by “U.S. citizens” merely residing there; listed in
28 U.S.C. §§ 81–111, including D.C. as if equivalent.

Defined as “political community of free citizens… organized under a
government sanctioned and limited by a written constitution.”
(Texas v. White, as quoted.)

Citizenship

Hypothesis: most people have been shifted into
federal / U.S. citizen status, which the document
equates with “subjects” lacking political rights and true sovereignty.

Two kinds of citizens (state and federal) recognized in cases like
Slaughterhouse; document treats “people of the United States”
as sovereign citizens of the several States.

Oaths / Office

Hypothesis: “No Oath, wrong Oath, or Oath taken in wrong sphere means
NO proper OFFICE means no authority.” Officers in the corporate sphere
are seen as private actors, not true public officers.

Art. VI, Cl. 3: “Members of the several State Legislatures, and all
executive and judicial Officers… shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation,
to support THIS Constitution.”

Jurisdiction

Hypothesis: Congress’ Art. IV territorial power has been
extended in practice over the people and states by
deception, pulling everyone into the corporate/territorial sphere.

Two spheres “are FOREIGN to one another” — document says the original
state-based republic and the territorial/corporate system do not overlap.

Process / Prosecutions

Hypothesis: in 28 U.S.C. § 108, “Nevada,” process runs in the name of
“STATE OF NEVADA” (all caps, corporate style), not “The State of Nevada”
as in the constitution — seen as evidence of corporate jurisdiction.

Example: Nevada Constitution — “The Style of all process shall be
‘The State of Nevada,’ and all prosecutions shall be conducted in the
name and by the authority of the same.”

Relationship to Commerce

Document: “If government… enters the domain of commerce… it submits
itself to the same laws that govern private individuals… in other words,
you are doing business with a private party!! not a sovereign…”

Government as sovereign; when it acts in commerce, it can be sued like
a private party, but its existence is not commercial.

Rights

Hypothesis: in the corporate sphere, you have
no unalienable rights, only privileges granted by
statute and subject to revocation.

“Unalienable Rights” from the Creator; Declaration: “all men are created
equal… endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights.”

How You “Get There”

Document: “then abandons his native Citizenship and adopts a FOREIGN
citizenship… then tries to FORCE… FROM the left political government
TO the right political government, THIS IS AN ACT OF TREASON!”
Hypothesis: this “abandonment” happened collectively via New Deal,
emergency, and commerce mechanisms.

Born in one of the several States as a citizen of that state and of
the United States in the constitutional sense.